Andres Pons Aguilera vs Andreu Bonet Maimo
Binissalem Open 16th, 2003 · Result 1–0 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Andres Pons Aguilera vs Andreu Bonet Maimo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Andres Pons Aguilera (1811)
- Black
- Andreu Bonet Maimo (1651)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Binissalem Open 16th
- Year
- 2003
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55)
About this chess game
This chess game between Andres Pons Aguilera (1811) and Andreu Bonet Maimo (1651) was played at Binissalem Open 16th in 2003 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Andres Pons Aguilera games or Andreu Bonet Maimo games? This Andres Pons Aguilera vs Andreu Bonet Maimo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Andres Pons Aguilera vs Andreu Bonet Maimo?
Andres Pons Aguilera vs Andreu Bonet Maimo (2003) finished 1–0, a win for Andres Pons Aguilera.
What opening was played in Andres Pons Aguilera vs Andreu Bonet Maimo?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (ECO C55).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Andres Pons Aguilera vs Andreu Bonet Maimo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.