Prof.Albert A. Ponelis vs Juergen Prof Dr Stephan
WC25-SF09, 2001 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84).
Analyze this game
Open Prof.Albert A. Ponelis vs Juergen Prof Dr Stephan on the CipherChess board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Open the Analysis BoardMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Prof.Albert A. Ponelis (1947)
- Black
- Juergen Prof Dr Stephan (2358)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- WC25-SF09
- Year
- 2001
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84)
About this chess game
This chess game between Prof.Albert A. Ponelis (1947) and Juergen Prof Dr Stephan (2358) was played at WC25-SF09 in 2001 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Prof.Albert A. Ponelis games or Juergen Prof Dr Stephan games? This Prof.Albert A. Ponelis vs Juergen Prof Dr Stephan encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Prof.Albert A. Ponelis vs Juergen Prof Dr Stephan?
Prof.Albert A. Ponelis vs Juergen Prof Dr Stephan (2001) finished 0–1, a win for Juergen Prof Dr Stephan.
What opening was played in Prof.Albert A. Ponelis vs Juergen Prof Dr Stephan?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (ECO B84).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Prof.Albert A. Ponelis vs Juergen Prof Dr Stephan, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.