Andreas Polyhronopoulos vs Rovertos-Antonios Sargologos
2004 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Andreas Polyhronopoulos vs Rovertos-Antonios Sargologos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Andreas Polyhronopoulos (2076)
- Black
- Rovertos-Antonios Sargologos (1960)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2004
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23)
About this chess game
This chess game between Andreas Polyhronopoulos (2076) and Rovertos-Antonios Sargologos (1960) was played in 2004 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Andreas Polyhronopoulos games or Rovertos-Antonios Sargologos games? This Andreas Polyhronopoulos vs Rovertos-Antonios Sargologos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Closed.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Andreas Polyhronopoulos vs Rovertos-Antonios Sargologos?
Andreas Polyhronopoulos vs Rovertos-Antonios Sargologos (2004) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Andreas Polyhronopoulos vs Rovertos-Antonios Sargologos?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Closed (ECO B23).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Andreas Polyhronopoulos vs Rovertos-Antonios Sargologos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.