Bogdan Polulikh vs Roman Khaetsky
Leonid Stein Mem 2017, 2017 · Result ½–½ · Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Bogdan Polulikh vs Roman Khaetsky with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Bogdan Polulikh (2165)
- Black
- Roman Khaetsky (2387)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Leonid Stein Mem 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88)
About this chess game
This chess game between Bogdan Polulikh (2165) and Roman Khaetsky (2387) was played at Leonid Stein Mem 2017 in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Bogdan Polulikh games or Roman Khaetsky games? This Bogdan Polulikh vs Roman Khaetsky encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Bogdan Polulikh vs Roman Khaetsky?
Bogdan Polulikh vs Roman Khaetsky (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Bogdan Polulikh vs Roman Khaetsky?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (ECO A88).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Bogdan Polulikh vs Roman Khaetsky, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.