Rodolfo Polonio vs Luis Alberto Passos Presa
2016 · Result ½–½ · Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation (D45).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rodolfo Polonio vs Luis Alberto Passos Presa with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rodolfo Polonio (1932)
- Black
- Luis Alberto Passos Presa (1739)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation (D45)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rodolfo Polonio (1932) and Luis Alberto Passos Presa (1739) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation (D45). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rodolfo Polonio games or Luis Alberto Passos Presa games? This Rodolfo Polonio vs Luis Alberto Passos Presa encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rodolfo Polonio vs Luis Alberto Passos Presa?
Rodolfo Polonio vs Luis Alberto Passos Presa (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Rodolfo Polonio vs Luis Alberto Passos Presa?
The game opened with the Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation (ECO D45).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rodolfo Polonio vs Luis Alberto Passos Presa, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.