Anatoliy Polivanov vs Oleg Budnikov
Nebesna Sotnya Mem Blitz, 2015 · Result 0–1 · King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Anatoliy Polivanov vs Oleg Budnikov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Anatoliy Polivanov (2394)
- Black
- Oleg Budnikov (2373)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Nebesna Sotnya Mem Blitz
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Anatoliy Polivanov (2394) and Oleg Budnikov (2373) was played at Nebesna Sotnya Mem Blitz in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Anatoliy Polivanov games or Oleg Budnikov games? This Anatoliy Polivanov vs Oleg Budnikov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Anatoliy Polivanov vs Oleg Budnikov?
Anatoliy Polivanov vs Oleg Budnikov (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Oleg Budnikov.
What opening was played in Anatoliy Polivanov vs Oleg Budnikov?
The game opened with the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (ECO C34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Anatoliy Polivanov vs Oleg Budnikov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.