Nicolas Policarpo vs Kleber Renato P. Zimmermann
2015 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nicolas Policarpo vs Kleber Renato P. Zimmermann with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nicolas Policarpo (1755)
- Black
- Kleber Renato P. Zimmermann (1968)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nicolas Policarpo (1755) and Kleber Renato P. Zimmermann (1968) was played in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nicolas Policarpo games or Kleber Renato P. Zimmermann games? This Nicolas Policarpo vs Kleber Renato P. Zimmermann encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nicolas Policarpo vs Kleber Renato P. Zimmermann?
Nicolas Policarpo vs Kleber Renato P. Zimmermann (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Kleber Renato P. Zimmermann.
What opening was played in Nicolas Policarpo vs Kleber Renato P. Zimmermann?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (ECO B90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nicolas Policarpo vs Kleber Renato P. Zimmermann, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.