Fausto Poletti vs Angelo Marco Salmoiraghi
11. Condino Open, 2011 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Fausto Poletti vs Angelo Marco Salmoiraghi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Fausto Poletti (1940)
- Black
- Angelo Marco Salmoiraghi (2152)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 11. Condino Open
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15)
About this chess game
This chess game between Fausto Poletti (1940) and Angelo Marco Salmoiraghi (2152) was played at 11. Condino Open in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Fausto Poletti games or Angelo Marco Salmoiraghi games? This Fausto Poletti vs Angelo Marco Salmoiraghi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Fausto Poletti vs Angelo Marco Salmoiraghi?
Fausto Poletti vs Angelo Marco Salmoiraghi (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Fausto Poletti vs Angelo Marco Salmoiraghi?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (ECO D15).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Fausto Poletti vs Angelo Marco Salmoiraghi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.