Tadeusz Polchowski vs Kele D Perkins
WS/A/201, 2020 · Result 0–1 · Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Petrosian System (D91).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Tadeusz Polchowski vs Kele D Perkins with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Tadeusz Polchowski
- Black
- Kele D Perkins
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- WS/A/201
- Year
- 2020
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Petrosian System (D91)
About this chess game
This chess game between Tadeusz Polchowski and Kele D Perkins was played at WS/A/201 in 2020 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Petrosian System (D91). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Tadeusz Polchowski games or Kele D Perkins games? This Tadeusz Polchowski vs Kele D Perkins encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Petrosian System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Tadeusz Polchowski vs Kele D Perkins?
Tadeusz Polchowski vs Kele D Perkins (2020) finished 0–1, a win for Kele D Perkins.
What opening was played in Tadeusz Polchowski vs Kele D Perkins?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Petrosian System (ECO D91).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Tadeusz Polchowski vs Kele D Perkins, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.