Quentin Poignot vs Denis Dupeux
30. Avoine Open 2015, 2015 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Quentin Poignot vs Denis Dupeux with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Quentin Poignot (2170)
- Black
- Denis Dupeux (1857)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 30. Avoine Open 2015
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Quentin Poignot (2170) and Denis Dupeux (1857) was played at 30. Avoine Open 2015 in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Quentin Poignot games or Denis Dupeux games? This Quentin Poignot vs Denis Dupeux encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Quentin Poignot vs Denis Dupeux?
Quentin Poignot vs Denis Dupeux (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Quentin Poignot.
What opening was played in Quentin Poignot vs Denis Dupeux?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (ECO B92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Quentin Poignot vs Denis Dupeux, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.