Caio Medeiros Poeta vs Allysson Ribeiro
2013 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Caio Medeiros Poeta vs Allysson Ribeiro with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Caio Medeiros Poeta (1901)
- Black
- Allysson Ribeiro (1927)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Caio Medeiros Poeta (1901) and Allysson Ribeiro (1927) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Caio Medeiros Poeta games or Allysson Ribeiro games? This Caio Medeiros Poeta vs Allysson Ribeiro encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Caio Medeiros Poeta vs Allysson Ribeiro?
Caio Medeiros Poeta vs Allysson Ribeiro (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Caio Medeiros Poeta vs Allysson Ribeiro?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (ECO A34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Caio Medeiros Poeta vs Allysson Ribeiro, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.