Alexander Podolskiy vs Christian Blume
2006 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Modern Variation (B83).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexander Podolskiy vs Christian Blume with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexander Podolskiy (2032)
- Black
- Christian Blume (1882)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Modern Variation (B83)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexander Podolskiy (2032) and Christian Blume (1882) was played in 2006 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Modern Variation (B83). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexander Podolskiy games or Christian Blume games? This Alexander Podolskiy vs Christian Blume encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexander Podolskiy vs Christian Blume?
Alexander Podolskiy vs Christian Blume (2006) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Alexander Podolskiy vs Christian Blume?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Modern Variation (ECO B83).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexander Podolskiy vs Christian Blume, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.