Martin Podolski vs Timo Pfaff
Hessen Ch U17, date unknown · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation (E39).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Martin Podolski vs Timo Pfaff with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Martin Podolski
- Black
- Timo Pfaff
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Hessen Ch U17
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation (E39)
About this chess game
This chess game between Martin Podolski and Timo Pfaff was played at Hessen Ch U17 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation (E39). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Martin Podolski games or Timo Pfaff games? This Martin Podolski vs Timo Pfaff encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Martin Podolski vs Timo Pfaff?
Martin Podolski vs Timo Pfaff finished 0–1, a win for Timo Pfaff.
What opening was played in Martin Podolski vs Timo Pfaff?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation, Pirc Variation (ECO E39).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Martin Podolski vs Timo Pfaff, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.