Michal Podjavorinsky vs Martin Budinsky
2018 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Michal Podjavorinsky vs Martin Budinsky with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Michal Podjavorinsky (1919)
- Black
- Martin Budinsky (2012)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Michal Podjavorinsky (1919) and Martin Budinsky (2012) was played in 2018 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Michal Podjavorinsky games or Martin Budinsky games? This Michal Podjavorinsky vs Martin Budinsky encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Michal Podjavorinsky vs Martin Budinsky?
Michal Podjavorinsky vs Martin Budinsky (2018) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Michal Podjavorinsky vs Martin Budinsky?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (ECO E34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Michal Podjavorinsky vs Martin Budinsky, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.