Martin Podhorsky vs Eugen Nemeth
2010 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Martin Podhorsky vs Eugen Nemeth with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Martin Podhorsky (2017)
- Black
- Eugen Nemeth (1960)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Martin Podhorsky (2017) and Eugen Nemeth (1960) was played in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Martin Podhorsky games or Eugen Nemeth games? This Martin Podhorsky vs Eugen Nemeth encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Martin Podhorsky vs Eugen Nemeth?
Martin Podhorsky vs Eugen Nemeth (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Eugen Nemeth.
What opening was played in Martin Podhorsky vs Eugen Nemeth?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (ECO B31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Martin Podhorsky vs Eugen Nemeth, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.