Martin, Dr. Ploog vs Collin Colbow
2017 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Martin, Dr. Ploog vs Collin Colbow with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Martin, Dr. Ploog (2101)
- Black
- Collin Colbow (1890)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Martin, Dr. Ploog (2101) and Collin Colbow (1890) was played in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Martin, Dr. Ploog games or Collin Colbow games? This Martin, Dr. Ploog vs Collin Colbow encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Martin, Dr. Ploog vs Collin Colbow?
Martin, Dr. Ploog vs Collin Colbow (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Martin, Dr. Ploog.
What opening was played in Martin, Dr. Ploog vs Collin Colbow?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (ECO A28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Martin, Dr. Ploog vs Collin Colbow, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.