Timo Pirttimaki vs Detlef Bloecker
Muerren Open U20, 1979 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Petrosian Variation, Normal Defense (E93).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Timo Pirttimaki vs Detlef Bloecker with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Timo Pirttimaki
- Black
- Detlef Bloecker
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Muerren Open U20
- Year
- 1979
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Petrosian Variation, Normal Defense (E93)
About this chess game
This chess game between Timo Pirttimaki and Detlef Bloecker was played at Muerren Open U20 in 1979 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Petrosian Variation, Normal Defense (E93). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Timo Pirttimaki games or Detlef Bloecker games? This Timo Pirttimaki vs Detlef Bloecker encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Petrosian Variation, Normal Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Timo Pirttimaki vs Detlef Bloecker?
Timo Pirttimaki vs Detlef Bloecker (1979) finished 1–0, a win for Timo Pirttimaki.
What opening was played in Timo Pirttimaki vs Detlef Bloecker?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Petrosian Variation, Normal Defense (ECO E93).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Timo Pirttimaki vs Detlef Bloecker, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.