Patryk Piotrowski vs Agnieszka Dmochowska
5. Gora Swietej Anny, 2012 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (B50).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Patryk Piotrowski vs Agnieszka Dmochowska with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Patryk Piotrowski (1525)
- Black
- Agnieszka Dmochowska (1683)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 5. Gora Swietej Anny
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (B50)
About this chess game
This chess game between Patryk Piotrowski (1525) and Agnieszka Dmochowska (1683) was played at 5. Gora Swietej Anny in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (B50). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Patryk Piotrowski games or Agnieszka Dmochowska games? This Patryk Piotrowski vs Agnieszka Dmochowska encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Patryk Piotrowski vs Agnieszka Dmochowska?
Patryk Piotrowski vs Agnieszka Dmochowska (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Agnieszka Dmochowska.
What opening was played in Patryk Piotrowski vs Agnieszka Dmochowska?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (ECO B50).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Patryk Piotrowski vs Agnieszka Dmochowska, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.