Rendrex Lopes Pinto vs Klaus Seiji Furucho Gotz
2013 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rendrex Lopes Pinto vs Klaus Seiji Furucho Gotz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rendrex Lopes Pinto (1946)
- Black
- Klaus Seiji Furucho Gotz (2081)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rendrex Lopes Pinto (1946) and Klaus Seiji Furucho Gotz (2081) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rendrex Lopes Pinto games or Klaus Seiji Furucho Gotz games? This Rendrex Lopes Pinto vs Klaus Seiji Furucho Gotz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rendrex Lopes Pinto vs Klaus Seiji Furucho Gotz?
Rendrex Lopes Pinto vs Klaus Seiji Furucho Gotz (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Rendrex Lopes Pinto vs Klaus Seiji Furucho Gotz?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (ECO E76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rendrex Lopes Pinto vs Klaus Seiji Furucho Gotz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.