Daniel Pinto Holguin vs Camilo Corredor Castellanos
2011 · Result 0–1 · Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation (C68).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Daniel Pinto Holguin vs Camilo Corredor Castellanos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Daniel Pinto Holguin (1912)
- Black
- Camilo Corredor Castellanos (2015)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation (C68)
About this chess game
This chess game between Daniel Pinto Holguin (1912) and Camilo Corredor Castellanos (2015) was played in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation (C68). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Daniel Pinto Holguin games or Camilo Corredor Castellanos games? This Daniel Pinto Holguin vs Camilo Corredor Castellanos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Daniel Pinto Holguin vs Camilo Corredor Castellanos?
Daniel Pinto Holguin vs Camilo Corredor Castellanos (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Camilo Corredor Castellanos.
What opening was played in Daniel Pinto Holguin vs Camilo Corredor Castellanos?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation (ECO C68).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Daniel Pinto Holguin vs Camilo Corredor Castellanos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.