Sergey Pimankin vs Razit Mukhamadeev
2008 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sergey Pimankin vs Razit Mukhamadeev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sergey Pimankin (2159)
- Black
- Razit Mukhamadeev (2090)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sergey Pimankin (2159) and Razit Mukhamadeev (2090) was played in 2008 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sergey Pimankin games or Razit Mukhamadeev games? This Sergey Pimankin vs Razit Mukhamadeev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sergey Pimankin vs Razit Mukhamadeev?
Sergey Pimankin vs Razit Mukhamadeev (2008) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Sergey Pimankin vs Razit Mukhamadeev?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (ECO A35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sergey Pimankin vs Razit Mukhamadeev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.