Peter Pilgrim vs Ankie Erwich Eisveld Bosch
2000 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Closed Variation (E87).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Peter Pilgrim vs Ankie Erwich Eisveld Bosch with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Peter Pilgrim (2060)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2000
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Closed Variation (E87)
About this chess game
This chess game between Peter Pilgrim (2060) and Ankie Erwich Eisveld Bosch was played in 2000 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Closed Variation (E87). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Peter Pilgrim games or Ankie Erwich Eisveld Bosch games? This Peter Pilgrim vs Ankie Erwich Eisveld Bosch encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Closed Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Peter Pilgrim vs Ankie Erwich Eisveld Bosch?
Peter Pilgrim vs Ankie Erwich Eisveld Bosch (2000) finished 1–0, a win for Peter Pilgrim.
What opening was played in Peter Pilgrim vs Ankie Erwich Eisveld Bosch?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Closed Variation (ECO E87).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Peter Pilgrim vs Ankie Erwich Eisveld Bosch, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.