Lucyna Pilarska vs Ivan Valerievich Petrov
DE5A/sf04, 2012 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E25).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lucyna Pilarska vs Ivan Valerievich Petrov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lucyna Pilarska (2411)
- Black
- Ivan Valerievich Petrov (2167)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- DE5A/sf04
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E25)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lucyna Pilarska (2411) and Ivan Valerievich Petrov (2167) was played at DE5A/sf04 in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E25). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lucyna Pilarska games or Ivan Valerievich Petrov games? This Lucyna Pilarska vs Ivan Valerievich Petrov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lucyna Pilarska vs Ivan Valerievich Petrov?
Lucyna Pilarska vs Ivan Valerievich Petrov (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Ivan Valerievich Petrov.
What opening was played in Lucyna Pilarska vs Ivan Valerievich Petrov?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (ECO E25).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lucyna Pilarska vs Ivan Valerievich Petrov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.