Petri Pietarinen vs Marko Haapamaki
FIN-chT2 0304, 2003 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Petri Pietarinen vs Marko Haapamaki with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Petri Pietarinen (2160)
- Black
- Marko Haapamaki (2088)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- FIN-chT2 0304
- Year
- 2003
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Petri Pietarinen (2160) and Marko Haapamaki (2088) was played at FIN-chT2 0304 in 2003 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Petri Pietarinen games or Marko Haapamaki games? This Petri Pietarinen vs Marko Haapamaki encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Petri Pietarinen vs Marko Haapamaki?
Petri Pietarinen vs Marko Haapamaki (2003) finished 1–0, a win for Petri Pietarinen.
What opening was played in Petri Pietarinen vs Marko Haapamaki?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Petri Pietarinen vs Marko Haapamaki, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.