Olaf Pienski vs Maximilian Reuter
2018 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (A25).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Olaf Pienski vs Maximilian Reuter with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Olaf Pienski (2089)
- Black
- Maximilian Reuter (1852)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (A25)
About this chess game
This chess game between Olaf Pienski (2089) and Maximilian Reuter (1852) was played in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (A25). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Olaf Pienski games or Maximilian Reuter games? This Olaf Pienski vs Maximilian Reuter encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Olaf Pienski vs Maximilian Reuter?
Olaf Pienski vs Maximilian Reuter (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Maximilian Reuter.
What opening was played in Olaf Pienski vs Maximilian Reuter?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (ECO A25).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Olaf Pienski vs Maximilian Reuter, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.