Danilo Piedrahita vs Luis Fernando Corredor Rengifo
2015 · Result 1–0 · Grünfeld Defense: Flohr Defense (D94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Danilo Piedrahita vs Luis Fernando Corredor Rengifo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Danilo Piedrahita (1775)
- Black
- Luis Fernando Corredor Rengifo (2037)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Flohr Defense (D94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Danilo Piedrahita (1775) and Luis Fernando Corredor Rengifo (2037) was played in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Flohr Defense (D94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Danilo Piedrahita games or Luis Fernando Corredor Rengifo games? This Danilo Piedrahita vs Luis Fernando Corredor Rengifo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Flohr Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Danilo Piedrahita vs Luis Fernando Corredor Rengifo?
Danilo Piedrahita vs Luis Fernando Corredor Rengifo (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Danilo Piedrahita.
What opening was played in Danilo Piedrahita vs Luis Fernando Corredor Rengifo?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Flohr Defense (ECO D94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Danilo Piedrahita vs Luis Fernando Corredor Rengifo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.