Lucas Fonseca Piccoli vs Rodrigo Machado Mendes
2015 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lucas Fonseca Piccoli vs Rodrigo Machado Mendes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lucas Fonseca Piccoli (1774)
- Black
- Rodrigo Machado Mendes (1927)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lucas Fonseca Piccoli (1774) and Rodrigo Machado Mendes (1927) was played in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lucas Fonseca Piccoli games or Rodrigo Machado Mendes games? This Lucas Fonseca Piccoli vs Rodrigo Machado Mendes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lucas Fonseca Piccoli vs Rodrigo Machado Mendes?
Lucas Fonseca Piccoli vs Rodrigo Machado Mendes (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Rodrigo Machado Mendes.
What opening was played in Lucas Fonseca Piccoli vs Rodrigo Machado Mendes?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (ECO A30).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lucas Fonseca Piccoli vs Rodrigo Machado Mendes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.