Raffaele Petruzzelli vs Austin Lockwood
CT23 pr 50, 2020 · Result 0–1 · Catalan Opening: Closed, Zagoryansky Variation (E08).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Raffaele Petruzzelli vs Austin Lockwood with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Raffaele Petruzzelli (1993)
- Black
- Austin Lockwood (2407)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- CT23 pr 50
- Year
- 2020
- Opening
- Catalan Opening: Closed, Zagoryansky Variation (E08)
About this chess game
This chess game between Raffaele Petruzzelli (1993) and Austin Lockwood (2407) was played at CT23 pr 50 in 2020 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Catalan Opening: Closed, Zagoryansky Variation (E08). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Raffaele Petruzzelli games or Austin Lockwood games? This Raffaele Petruzzelli vs Austin Lockwood encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Catalan Opening: Closed, Zagoryansky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Raffaele Petruzzelli vs Austin Lockwood?
Raffaele Petruzzelli vs Austin Lockwood (2020) finished 0–1, a win for Austin Lockwood.
What opening was played in Raffaele Petruzzelli vs Austin Lockwood?
The game opened with the Catalan Opening: Closed, Zagoryansky Variation (ECO E08).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Raffaele Petruzzelli vs Austin Lockwood, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.