Tomas Petrik vs Alois Lanc
2010 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations (B66).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Tomas Petrik vs Alois Lanc with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Tomas Petrik (2531)
- Black
- Alois Lanc (2411)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations (B66)
About this chess game
This chess game between Tomas Petrik (2531) and Alois Lanc (2411) was played in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations (B66). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Tomas Petrik games or Alois Lanc games? This Tomas Petrik vs Alois Lanc encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Tomas Petrik vs Alois Lanc?
Tomas Petrik vs Alois Lanc (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Tomas Petrik.
What opening was played in Tomas Petrik vs Alois Lanc?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Early Deviations (ECO B66).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Tomas Petrik vs Alois Lanc, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.