Marc Petit Montes vs Sergio Recacha Limeres
2014 · Result 1–0 · Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (A58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marc Petit Montes vs Sergio Recacha Limeres with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marc Petit Montes (1710)
- Black
- Sergio Recacha Limeres (1549)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (A58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marc Petit Montes (1710) and Sergio Recacha Limeres (1549) was played in 2014 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (A58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marc Petit Montes games or Sergio Recacha Limeres games? This Marc Petit Montes vs Sergio Recacha Limeres encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marc Petit Montes vs Sergio Recacha Limeres?
Marc Petit Montes vs Sergio Recacha Limeres (2014) finished 1–0, a win for Marc Petit Montes.
What opening was played in Marc Petit Montes vs Sergio Recacha Limeres?
The game opened with the Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (ECO A58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marc Petit Montes vs Sergio Recacha Limeres, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.