Hans Petersen vs Samuel Lifshitz
1. LSS Anni F-00008, 2008 · Result 1–0 · Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (A89).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Hans Petersen vs Samuel Lifshitz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Hans Petersen (1157)
- Black
- Samuel Lifshitz (2078)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 1. LSS Anni F-00008
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (A89)
About this chess game
This chess game between Hans Petersen (1157) and Samuel Lifshitz (2078) was played at 1. LSS Anni F-00008 in 2008 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (A89). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Hans Petersen games or Samuel Lifshitz games? This Hans Petersen vs Samuel Lifshitz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Hans Petersen vs Samuel Lifshitz?
Hans Petersen vs Samuel Lifshitz (2008) finished 1–0, a win for Hans Petersen.
What opening was played in Hans Petersen vs Samuel Lifshitz?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (ECO A89).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Hans Petersen vs Samuel Lifshitz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.