Michael Peters vs Gabriel Mirza
29. ECC Open 2013, 2013 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Closed Variation (E87).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Michael Peters vs Gabriel Mirza with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Michael Peters (2019)
- Black
- Gabriel Mirza (1735)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 29. ECC Open 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Closed Variation (E87)
About this chess game
This chess game between Michael Peters (2019) and Gabriel Mirza (1735) was played at 29. ECC Open 2013 in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Closed Variation (E87). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Michael Peters games or Gabriel Mirza games? This Michael Peters vs Gabriel Mirza encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Closed Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Michael Peters vs Gabriel Mirza?
Michael Peters vs Gabriel Mirza (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Michael Peters.
What opening was played in Michael Peters vs Gabriel Mirza?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Closed Variation (ECO E87).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Michael Peters vs Gabriel Mirza, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.