Celso Pesco vs Jose Medeiros
Paranaense Ch Absoluto, 2000 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (A22).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Celso Pesco vs Jose Medeiros with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Celso Pesco
- Black
- Jose Medeiros (1929)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Paranaense Ch Absoluto
- Year
- 2000
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (A22)
About this chess game
This chess game between Celso Pesco and Jose Medeiros (1929) was played at Paranaense Ch Absoluto in 2000 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (A22). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Celso Pesco games or Jose Medeiros games? This Celso Pesco vs Jose Medeiros encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Celso Pesco vs Jose Medeiros?
Celso Pesco vs Jose Medeiros (2000) finished 0–1, a win for Jose Medeiros.
What opening was played in Celso Pesco vs Jose Medeiros?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (ECO A22).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Celso Pesco vs Jose Medeiros, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.