Laszlo Pergel vs Istvan Gosztola
2013 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Laszlo Pergel vs Istvan Gosztola with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Laszlo Pergel (2252)
- Black
- Istvan Gosztola (2136)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Laszlo Pergel (2252) and Istvan Gosztola (2136) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (B31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Laszlo Pergel games or Istvan Gosztola games? This Laszlo Pergel vs Istvan Gosztola encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Laszlo Pergel vs Istvan Gosztola?
Laszlo Pergel vs Istvan Gosztola (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Laszlo Pergel vs Istvan Gosztola?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation (ECO B31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Laszlo Pergel vs Istvan Gosztola, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.