Santiago Perez Gisbert vs Joaquin Ballester Sanz
2016 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Santiago Perez Gisbert vs Joaquin Ballester Sanz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Santiago Perez Gisbert (2029)
- Black
- Joaquin Ballester Sanz (2105)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76)
About this chess game
This chess game between Santiago Perez Gisbert (2029) and Joaquin Ballester Sanz (2105) was played in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Santiago Perez Gisbert games or Joaquin Ballester Sanz games? This Santiago Perez Gisbert vs Joaquin Ballester Sanz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Santiago Perez Gisbert vs Joaquin Ballester Sanz?
Santiago Perez Gisbert vs Joaquin Ballester Sanz (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Santiago Perez Gisbert.
What opening was played in Santiago Perez Gisbert vs Joaquin Ballester Sanz?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (ECO B76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Santiago Perez Gisbert vs Joaquin Ballester Sanz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.