Jimena Perez Garcia vs Marcelino Ramos Santana
XVIII Memorial Pedro Lezcano Montalvo 2026, 2026 · Result 1–0 · Benko Gambit (A57).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jimena Perez Garcia vs Marcelino Ramos Santana with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jimena Perez Garcia (1974)
- Black
- Marcelino Ramos Santana (1876)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- XVIII Memorial Pedro Lezcano Montalvo 2026
- Year
- 2026
- Opening
- Benko Gambit (A57)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jimena Perez Garcia (1974) and Marcelino Ramos Santana (1876) was played at XVIII Memorial Pedro Lezcano Montalvo 2026 in 2026 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Benko Gambit (A57). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jimena Perez Garcia games or Marcelino Ramos Santana games? This Jimena Perez Garcia vs Marcelino Ramos Santana encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benko Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jimena Perez Garcia vs Marcelino Ramos Santana?
Jimena Perez Garcia vs Marcelino Ramos Santana (2026) finished 1–0, a win for Jimena Perez Garcia.
What opening was played in Jimena Perez Garcia vs Marcelino Ramos Santana?
The game opened with the Benko Gambit (ECO A57).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jimena Perez Garcia vs Marcelino Ramos Santana, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.