Juan Angel Perez Garcia vs Isaac Lozano Osorio
2016 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Indian Defense: Kasparov Variation (E13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juan Angel Perez Garcia vs Isaac Lozano Osorio with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juan Angel Perez Garcia (1911)
- Black
- Isaac Lozano Osorio (1999)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Kasparov Variation (E13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juan Angel Perez Garcia (1911) and Isaac Lozano Osorio (1999) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Kasparov Variation (E13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juan Angel Perez Garcia games or Isaac Lozano Osorio games? This Juan Angel Perez Garcia vs Isaac Lozano Osorio encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Kasparov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juan Angel Perez Garcia vs Isaac Lozano Osorio?
Juan Angel Perez Garcia vs Isaac Lozano Osorio (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Juan Angel Perez Garcia vs Isaac Lozano Osorio?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Kasparov Variation (ECO E13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juan Angel Perez Garcia vs Isaac Lozano Osorio, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.