Rodney Oscar Perez Garcia vs Robert Gardner
8. Edmonton Int, 2013 · Result 1–0 · Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rodney Oscar Perez Garcia vs Robert Gardner with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rodney Oscar Perez Garcia (2364)
- Black
- Robert Gardner (2213)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 8. Edmonton Int
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rodney Oscar Perez Garcia (2364) and Robert Gardner (2213) was played at 8. Edmonton Int in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rodney Oscar Perez Garcia games or Robert Gardner games? This Rodney Oscar Perez Garcia vs Robert Gardner encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rodney Oscar Perez Garcia vs Robert Gardner?
Rodney Oscar Perez Garcia vs Robert Gardner (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Rodney Oscar Perez Garcia.
What opening was played in Rodney Oscar Perez Garcia vs Robert Gardner?
The game opened with the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B08).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rodney Oscar Perez Garcia vs Robert Gardner, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.