Marcos Adrian Perez Felipe vs Rodrigo Iglesias Santos
6. San Cristobal Open, 2024 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense (D10).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marcos Adrian Perez Felipe vs Rodrigo Iglesias Santos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marcos Adrian Perez Felipe (2173)
- Black
- Rodrigo Iglesias Santos (1914)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 6. San Cristobal Open
- Year
- 2024
- Opening
- Slav Defense (D10)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marcos Adrian Perez Felipe (2173) and Rodrigo Iglesias Santos (1914) was played at 6. San Cristobal Open in 2024 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense (D10). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marcos Adrian Perez Felipe games or Rodrigo Iglesias Santos games? This Marcos Adrian Perez Felipe vs Rodrigo Iglesias Santos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marcos Adrian Perez Felipe vs Rodrigo Iglesias Santos?
Marcos Adrian Perez Felipe vs Rodrigo Iglesias Santos (2024) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Marcos Adrian Perez Felipe vs Rodrigo Iglesias Santos?
The game opened with the Slav Defense (ECO D10).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marcos Adrian Perez Felipe vs Rodrigo Iglesias Santos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.