Andres Eloy Perez Candelas vs Federico Perez Ponsa
2019 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Andres Eloy Perez Candelas vs Federico Perez Ponsa with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Andres Eloy Perez Candelas (2297)
- Black
- Federico Perez Ponsa (2564)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22)
About this chess game
This chess game between Andres Eloy Perez Candelas (2297) and Federico Perez Ponsa (2564) was played in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Andres Eloy Perez Candelas games or Federico Perez Ponsa games? This Andres Eloy Perez Candelas vs Federico Perez Ponsa encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Andres Eloy Perez Candelas vs Federico Perez Ponsa?
Andres Eloy Perez Candelas vs Federico Perez Ponsa (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Andres Eloy Perez Candelas vs Federico Perez Ponsa?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (ECO B22).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Andres Eloy Perez Candelas vs Federico Perez Ponsa, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.