Vjacheslav Perevozchikov vs Adam Clontz
FICGS__CHESS__WCH_STAGE_1_GROUP_14__000008, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense (C65).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vjacheslav Perevozchikov vs Adam Clontz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vjacheslav Perevozchikov (2112)
- Black
- Adam Clontz (1521)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- FICGS__CHESS__WCH_STAGE_1_GROUP_14__000008
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense (C65)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vjacheslav Perevozchikov (2112) and Adam Clontz (1521) was played at FICGS__CHESS__WCH_STAGE_1_GROUP_14__000008 in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense (C65). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vjacheslav Perevozchikov games or Adam Clontz games? This Vjacheslav Perevozchikov vs Adam Clontz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vjacheslav Perevozchikov vs Adam Clontz?
Vjacheslav Perevozchikov vs Adam Clontz (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Vjacheslav Perevozchikov.
What opening was played in Vjacheslav Perevozchikov vs Adam Clontz?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense (ECO C65).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vjacheslav Perevozchikov vs Adam Clontz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.