Jefferson Silva Dos Peres vs Lucas Koji Takeda
2014 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation (D50).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jefferson Silva Dos Peres vs Lucas Koji Takeda with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jefferson Silva Dos Peres (1890)
- Black
- Lucas Koji Takeda (2015)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation (D50)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jefferson Silva Dos Peres (1890) and Lucas Koji Takeda (2015) was played in 2014 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation (D50). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jefferson Silva Dos Peres games or Lucas Koji Takeda games? This Jefferson Silva Dos Peres vs Lucas Koji Takeda encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jefferson Silva Dos Peres vs Lucas Koji Takeda?
Jefferson Silva Dos Peres vs Lucas Koji Takeda (2014) finished 0–1, a win for Lucas Koji Takeda.
What opening was played in Jefferson Silva Dos Peres vs Lucas Koji Takeda?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Modern Variation (ECO D50).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jefferson Silva Dos Peres vs Lucas Koji Takeda, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.