Leandro Daniel Perdomo vs Alvaro Zimmermann Aranha Filho
2017 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense (E20).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Leandro Daniel Perdomo vs Alvaro Zimmermann Aranha Filho with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Leandro Daniel Perdomo (2462)
- Black
- Alvaro Zimmermann Aranha Filho (2343)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense (E20)
About this chess game
This chess game between Leandro Daniel Perdomo (2462) and Alvaro Zimmermann Aranha Filho (2343) was played in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense (E20). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Leandro Daniel Perdomo games or Alvaro Zimmermann Aranha Filho games? This Leandro Daniel Perdomo vs Alvaro Zimmermann Aranha Filho encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Leandro Daniel Perdomo vs Alvaro Zimmermann Aranha Filho?
Leandro Daniel Perdomo vs Alvaro Zimmermann Aranha Filho (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Leandro Daniel Perdomo.
What opening was played in Leandro Daniel Perdomo vs Alvaro Zimmermann Aranha Filho?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense (ECO E20).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Leandro Daniel Perdomo vs Alvaro Zimmermann Aranha Filho, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.