Juan Jose Perdomo Arvelaez vs Fabian Jose Alvarado Espana
2017 · Result ½–½ · Scandinavian Defense (B01).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juan Jose Perdomo Arvelaez vs Fabian Jose Alvarado Espana with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juan Jose Perdomo Arvelaez (2116)
- Black
- Fabian Jose Alvarado Espana (2003)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Scandinavian Defense (B01)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juan Jose Perdomo Arvelaez (2116) and Fabian Jose Alvarado Espana (2003) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Scandinavian Defense (B01). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juan Jose Perdomo Arvelaez games or Fabian Jose Alvarado Espana games? This Juan Jose Perdomo Arvelaez vs Fabian Jose Alvarado Espana encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Scandinavian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juan Jose Perdomo Arvelaez vs Fabian Jose Alvarado Espana?
Juan Jose Perdomo Arvelaez vs Fabian Jose Alvarado Espana (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Juan Jose Perdomo Arvelaez vs Fabian Jose Alvarado Espana?
The game opened with the Scandinavian Defense (ECO B01).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juan Jose Perdomo Arvelaez vs Fabian Jose Alvarado Espana, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.