Janos Percze vs Daniel Dr. Straubinger
2010 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (D19).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Janos Percze vs Daniel Dr. Straubinger with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Janos Percze (2247)
- Black
- Daniel Dr. Straubinger (2198)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (D19)
About this chess game
This chess game between Janos Percze (2247) and Daniel Dr. Straubinger (2198) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (D19). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Janos Percze games or Daniel Dr. Straubinger games? This Janos Percze vs Daniel Dr. Straubinger encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Janos Percze vs Daniel Dr. Straubinger?
Janos Percze vs Daniel Dr. Straubinger (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Janos Percze vs Daniel Dr. Straubinger?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Classical System, Main Line (ECO D19).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Janos Percze vs Daniel Dr. Straubinger, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.