Fernando Peralta vs Guillem Porta Tovar
24. Montcada Open 2016, 2016 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Fernando Peralta vs Guillem Porta Tovar with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Fernando Peralta (2588)
- Black
- Guillem Porta Tovar (2210)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 24. Montcada Open 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Fernando Peralta (2588) and Guillem Porta Tovar (2210) was played at 24. Montcada Open 2016 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Fernando Peralta games or Guillem Porta Tovar games? This Fernando Peralta vs Guillem Porta Tovar encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Fernando Peralta vs Guillem Porta Tovar?
Fernando Peralta vs Guillem Porta Tovar (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Fernando Peralta.
What opening was played in Fernando Peralta vs Guillem Porta Tovar?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (ECO E90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Fernando Peralta vs Guillem Porta Tovar, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.