Nestor Penas Burgos vs Cesar Daniel Rativa Jimenez
2019 · Result 0–1 · Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation (C26).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nestor Penas Burgos vs Cesar Daniel Rativa Jimenez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nestor Penas Burgos (1718)
- Black
- Cesar Daniel Rativa Jimenez (1921)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation (C26)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nestor Penas Burgos (1718) and Cesar Daniel Rativa Jimenez (1921) was played in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation (C26). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nestor Penas Burgos games or Cesar Daniel Rativa Jimenez games? This Nestor Penas Burgos vs Cesar Daniel Rativa Jimenez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nestor Penas Burgos vs Cesar Daniel Rativa Jimenez?
Nestor Penas Burgos vs Cesar Daniel Rativa Jimenez (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Cesar Daniel Rativa Jimenez.
What opening was played in Nestor Penas Burgos vs Cesar Daniel Rativa Jimenez?
The game opened with the Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation (ECO C26).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nestor Penas Burgos vs Cesar Daniel Rativa Jimenez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.