Juan Penafiel Lopez vs Jose Antonio Garcia Domingo
2004 · Result ½–½ · Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (A91).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juan Penafiel Lopez vs Jose Antonio Garcia Domingo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juan Penafiel Lopez (2097)
- Black
- Jose Antonio Garcia Domingo (2066)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2004
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (A91)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juan Penafiel Lopez (2097) and Jose Antonio Garcia Domingo (2066) was played in 2004 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (A91). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juan Penafiel Lopez games or Jose Antonio Garcia Domingo games? This Juan Penafiel Lopez vs Jose Antonio Garcia Domingo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juan Penafiel Lopez vs Jose Antonio Garcia Domingo?
Juan Penafiel Lopez vs Jose Antonio Garcia Domingo (2004) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Juan Penafiel Lopez vs Jose Antonio Garcia Domingo?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (ECO A91).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juan Penafiel Lopez vs Jose Antonio Garcia Domingo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.