Alcides Pena vs Jessenia Rojas Solano
2013 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Exchange Variation (E79).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alcides Pena vs Jessenia Rojas Solano with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alcides Pena (1865)
- Black
- Jessenia Rojas Solano (1868)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Exchange Variation (E79)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alcides Pena (1865) and Jessenia Rojas Solano (1868) was played in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Exchange Variation (E79). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alcides Pena games or Jessenia Rojas Solano games? This Alcides Pena vs Jessenia Rojas Solano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alcides Pena vs Jessenia Rojas Solano?
Alcides Pena vs Jessenia Rojas Solano (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Alcides Pena.
What opening was played in Alcides Pena vs Jessenia Rojas Solano?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Exchange Variation (ECO E79).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alcides Pena vs Jessenia Rojas Solano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.