David Pena Mor vs Francisco Padilla Carmona
2018 · Result ½–½ · Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack, Castling Line (C86).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David Pena Mor vs Francisco Padilla Carmona with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David Pena Mor (1866)
- Black
- Francisco Padilla Carmona (1786)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack, Castling Line (C86)
About this chess game
This chess game between David Pena Mor (1866) and Francisco Padilla Carmona (1786) was played in 2018 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack, Castling Line (C86). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David Pena Mor games or Francisco Padilla Carmona games? This David Pena Mor vs Francisco Padilla Carmona encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack, Castling Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David Pena Mor vs Francisco Padilla Carmona?
David Pena Mor vs Francisco Padilla Carmona (2018) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in David Pena Mor vs Francisco Padilla Carmona?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Worrall Attack, Castling Line (ECO C86).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David Pena Mor vs Francisco Padilla Carmona, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.